dimas
Not a member
dimas's latest activity
Wednesday, October 27 2010
-
dimas commented at 5:55 PMBen, I'm only able to test either released version by gem update'ing to it or I can apply a patch to the installed version 0.8.6. But to be honest I have no ide...
Friday, September 03 2010
-
dimas commented at 5:11 PMBen,
The issue is still 100% reproducible. I just upgraded to 0.8.6 and see no changes in the related code. Please re-read the whole thread - i know it is borin...
Thursday, January 07 2010
-
dimas commented at 7:28 AMI'm curious if jay lost interest to the project? :)
To me this is most critical issue in the Adhearsion ever because it renders AMI adapter nearly unusable for ...
Sunday, November 22 2009
-
dimas commented at 7:11 AMJay, I'm not sure if you are working on this issue (needless to say it is the most critical of all the issues I reported because it makes adhearsion return rubb...
Tuesday, November 17 2009
-
dimas commented at 4:46 PMIt seems the issue is caused by the problem in Asterisk itself. I opened issue on their Mantis - https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16264
-
dimas commented at 5:01 AMAgree, this should work too. I missed your idea in the text above.
However there is one thing you need take care about: the buffer should not grow uncontrollabl...
Monday, November 16 2009
-
dimas commented at 7:39 PMYep, I believe the problem is still same.
The code of extend_buffer_with changed a little but it still does not change pointers. There are lots of them - @curre...
Sunday, November 15 2009
-
dimas commented at 8:29 AMEither I'm doing something wrong or it does not help.
Here is the test codeAdhearsion::VoIP::Asterisk::Manager::ManagerInterface::CAUSAL_EVENT_NAMES << "dbge...
Saturday, November 14 2009
-
dimas commented at 9:54 PMResearching Asterisk source code. Now I'm convinced they expect developer to format body as 'Header1;value,Header2:value' etc. Which of course makes sense.
Whic...